A frequently asked question is: how realistic is the scene in 2001: A Space Odyssey where astronaut Bowman makes a space-walk without a helmet? How long could a human survive if exposed to vacuum? Would you explode? Would you survive? How long would you remain conscious?
The quick answers to these questions are: Clarke got it about right in 2001. You would survive about a ninety seconds, you wouldn't explode, you would remain conscious for about ten seconds.
The best data I have comes from the chapter on the effects of Barometric pressure in Bioastronautics Data Book, Second edition, NASA SP-3006. This chapter discusses animal studies of decompression to vacuum. It does not mention any human studies.
page 5, (following a general
discussion of low pressures and ebullism), the author gives an account
of what is to be the expected result of vacuum exposure:
"Some degree of consciousness will probably be retained for 9 to 11
seconds (see chapter 2 under Hypoxia). In rapid sequence thereafter,
paralysis will be followed by generalized convulsions and paralysis
once again. During this time, water vapor will form rapidly in the soft
tissues and somewhat less rapidly in the venous blood. This evolution
of water vapor will cause marked swelling of the body to perhaps twice
its normal volume unless it is restrained by a pressure suit. (It has
been demonstrated that a properly fitted elastic garment can entirely
prevent ebullism at pressures as low as 15 mm Hg absolute [Webb, 1969,
1970].) Heart rate may rise initially, but will fall rapidly
thereafter. Arterial blood pressure will also fall over a period of 30
to 60 seconds, while venous pressure rises due to distention of the
venous system by gas and vapor. Venous pressure will meet or exceed
arterial pressure within one minute. There will be virtually no
effective circulation of blood. After an initial rush of gas from the
lungs during decompression, gas and water vapor will continue to flow
outward through the airways. This continual evaporation of water will
cool the mouth and nose to near-freezing temperatures; the remainder of
the body will also become cooled, but more slowly.
"Cook and Bancroft (1966) reported occasional deaths of animals due to fibrillation of the heart during the first minute of exposure to near vacuum conditions. Ordinarily, however, survival was the rule if recompression occurred within about 90 seconds. ... Once heart action ceased, death was inevitable, despite attempts at resuscitation....
[on recompression] "Breathing usually began spontaneously... Neurological problems, including blindness and other defects in vision, were common after exposures (see problems due to evolved gas), but usually disappeared fairly rapidly.
"It is very unlikely that a human suddenly exposed to a vacuum would have more than 5 to 10 seconds to help himself. If immediate help is at hand, although one's appearance and condition will be grave, it is reasonable to assume that recompression to a tolerable pressure (200 mm Hg, 3.8 psia) within 60 to 90 seconds could result in survival, and possibly in rather rapid recovery."
Note that this discussion covers the effect of vacuum exposure only. The decompression event itself can have disasterous effects if the person being decompressed makes the mistake of trying to hold his or her breath. This will result in rupturing of the lungs, with almost certainly fatal results. There is a good reason that it is called "explosive" decompression.
The Bioastronautics Data Book answers this question: "Some degree of consciousness will probably be retained for 9 to 11 seconds.... It is very unlikely that a human suddenly exposed to a vacuum would have more than 5 to 10 seconds to help himself."
A larger body of information about how long you would remain conscious comes from aviation medicine. Aviation medicine defines the "time of useful consciousness", that is, how long after a decompression incident pilots will be awake and be sufficiently aware to take active measures to save their lives. Above 40,000 feet (12 km), the time of useful consciousness is 12 to 25 seconds. (The shorter figure is for a person actively moving; the longer figure is for a person sitting quietly.) For complete vacuum, this will be slightly less; 9 to 11 seconds quoted by the Bioastronautics data book, 9 to 12 seconds quoted by Fischer. Linda Pendleton adds to this: "An explosive or rapid decompression will cut this time in half due to the startle factor and the accelerated rate at which an adrenaline-soaked body burns oxygen." See Aircraft decompression
A slightly more general interest book, Survival in Space by Richard Harding, echoes this conclusion:
"At altitudes greater than 45,000 feet (13,716 m), unconsciousness
develops in fifteen to twenty seconds with death following four minutes
or so later."
and later:
"monkeys and dogs have successfully recovered from brief (up to two minutes) unprotected exposures..."
No.
Your blood is at a higher pressure than the outside environment. A typical blood pressure might be 75/120. The "75" part of this means that between heartbeats, the blood is at a pressure of 75 Torr (equal to about 100 mbar) above the external pressure. If the external pressure drops to zero, at a blood pressure of 75 Torr the boiling point of water is 46 degrees Celsius (115 F). This is well above body temperature of 37 C (98.6 F). Blood won't boil, because the elastic pressure of the blood vessels keeps it it a pressure high enough that the body temperature is below the boiling point-- at least, until the heart stops beating (at which point you have other things to worry about!). (To be more pedantic, blood pressure varies depending on where in the body it is measured, so the above statement should be understood as a generalization. However, the effect of small pockets of localized vapor is to increase the pressure. In places where the blood pressure is lowest, the vapor pressure will rise until equilibrium is reached. The net result is the same.)
Human experience is discussed by Roth, in the NASA technical report Rapid (Explosive) Decompression Emergencies in Pressure-Suited Subjects. Its focus is on decompression, rather than vacuum exposure per se, but it still has a lot of good information, including the results of decompression events involving humans.
There are several cases of humans surviving exposure to vacuum worth noting.
In 1966 a technician at NASA Houston was decompressed to vacuum in a space-suit test accident.
This case is discussed by Roth in the reference above. He lost consciousness in 12-15 seconds.
When pressure was restored after about 30 seconds of exposure, he regained consciousness, with no apparent injury sustained.
A few further details are given here.
Before jumping to the
conclusion that space exposure is harmless, however, it is worth noting
that in the same report, Roth includes a report of the autopsy of the
victim of a slightly longer explosive decompression incident:
"Immediately following rapid decompression, it was noted that he
began to cough moderately. Very shortly after this he was seen to lose
consciousness, and the picture described by the physicians on duty was
that the patient remained deeply cyanotic, totally unresponsive and
flaccid during the 2-3 minutes [to repressurise the altitude chamber]
down to ground level.
... "Manual artificial respiration was begun immediately... The
patient at no time breathed spontaneously; however, at the moment
ground level was reached he was seen to give a few gasps. These were
very irregular and only two or three in number.
...
"The conclusion of the [autopsy] report was as follows: "The major
pathologic changes as outlined above are consistent with asphyxia. It
is felt that the underlying cause of death in this case may be
attributed to acute cardio-respiratory failure, secondary to bilateral
pneumothorax..." "
Many other cases of death following decompression are noted in the aviation literature, including one spaceflight incident, the Soyuz-11 decompression accident, in 1971. A recent analysis of this accident can be found in D. J. Shayler, Disasters and Accidents in Manned Spaceflight.
On the subject of
partial-body vacuum exposure, the results are not quite as serious. In
1960, during a high-altitude balloon parachute-jump, a partial-body
vacuum exposure incident occurred when Joe Kittinger, Jr. lost
pressurization in his right glove during an ascent to 103,000 ft (19.5
miles) in an unpressurized balloon gondola, Despite the
depressurization, he continued the mission, and although the hand
became painful and useless, after he returned to the ground, his hand
returned to normal.
Kittinger wrote in National Geographic (November 1960):
"At 43,000 feet I find out [what can go wrong]. My right hand does not feel normal.
I examine the pressure glove; its air bladder is not inflating.
The prospect of exposing the hand to the near-vacuum of peak
altitude causes me some concern. From my previous experiences, I know
that the hand will swell, lose most of its circulation, and cause
extreme pain.... I decide to continue the ascent,
without notifying ground control of my difficulty."
at 103,000 feet, he writes:
"Circulation has
almost stopped in my unpressurized right hand, which feels stiff and
painful."
But at the landing:
"Dick looks at the swollen hand with concern. Three hours later the swelling will have disappeared with no ill effect."
The decompression incident on Kittinger's balloon jump is discussed further in Shayler's Disasters and Accidents in Manned Spaceflight:
[When Kittinger reached his peak altitude]
"his right hand was twice the normal size... He tried to release some
of his equipment prior to landing, but was not able to as his right
hand was still in great pain. He hit the ground 13 min. 45 sec. after
leaving Excelsior. Three hours after landing his swollen hand and his
circulation were back to normal."
See also from Leonard Gordon, Aviation Week, February 13th 1996.
Finally, posting to sci.space, Gregory Bennett discussed an actual space incident:
"Incidentally, we have had one experience with a suit puncture on
the Shuttle flights. On STS-37, during one of my flight experiments,
the palm restraint in one of the astronaut's gloves came loose and
migrated until it punched a hole in the pressure bladder between his
thumb and forefinger. It was not explosive decompression, just a little
1/8 inch hole, but it was exciting down here in the swamp because it
was the first injury we've ever head from a suit incident. Amazingly,
the astronaut in question didn't even know the puncture had occured; he
was so hopped on adrenalin it wasn't until after he got back in that he
even noticed there was a painful red mark on his hand. He figured his
glove was chafing and didn't worry about it.... What happened: when the
metal bar punctured the glove, the skin of the astronaut's hand
partially sealed the opening. He bled into space, and at the same time
his coagulating blood sealed the opening enough that the bar was
retained inside the hole."
The discussion here has focussed only on exposure to vacuum. However, in general the action of being exposed to vacuum will also involve a rapid decompression. This event is generally known as "explosive decompression," and apart from the simple effect of vacuum on the body, the explosive decompression event itself will be hazardous. As noted, explosive decompression will be particularly bad if the decompression subject attempts to hold his or her breath during decompression.
In The USAF Flight Surgeon's Guide, Fischer lists the following effects due to mechanical expansion of gases during decompression.
The decompression time will depend on how big the hole is. For a fast estimate, you can assume that the air exiting through the hole will travel at the speed of sound. This gives you a quick (and only roughly accurate) rule of thumb: if you put a one square centimeter hole in a one cubic meter volume, the pressure will drop by a factor of ten every hundred seconds, and this time scales up proportionately to the volume, and scales down proportionately to the size of the hole. So, for example, a three-thousand cubic meter volume will decompress from 1 atmosphere to .01 atmosphere through a ten square centimeter hole on a time scale of a sixty thousand seconds (seventeen hours).
The seminal paper on the subject is by Demetriades in 1954: "On the Decompression of a Punctured Pressurized Cabin in Vacuum Flight."
More accurately, for laminar viscous flow (that is, near atmospheric pressure), using Prandtl's equation in the limit Po/P is zero, and assuming a simple aperture (a pipe of zero length), the gas flow conductance is Cvisc= 20 A liters/second (for A in square centimeters) and hence the pressure drop is:
P = Pinitial exp (-0.02 tA/V)
where V is volume in cubic meters, t is time in seconds, and A is area in square centimeters. As the pressure decreases the flow changes to molecular flow, and the depressurization rate decreases by about a factor of two. This is for air at 20 C; for the case of pure oxygen, the leak rate is about 10 percent slower.For reference, when the pressure drops to about 50% of atmospheric, the subject will be entering the region of "critical hypoxia"; when the pressure drops to about 15% of atmospheric, the remaining time of useful consciousness will have decreased to the 9-12 seconds characteristic of vacuum.
Professor Andrew J. Higgins
of McGill University
posted a more detailed answer to the question of how fast a spacecraft
will decompress through a given size hole on Usenet. With his
permission, I have copied his response here: Higgins discussion of decompression rate.
Revised 27 June 2000
Revised 8 Jan. 2001
copyright 2000 by Geoffrey A. Landis
revisions copyright 2001 by Geoffrey A. Landis